HomeWorkspacesMaintenance
A working day with Maintenance · illustrative scenario

You do your work.
The context stays with you.

Send the technician the location, manual and previous intervention separately. Explore how the intended workflow keeps the work together. This is an explanatory scenario, not a functioning customer environment.

01Receive the notificationAccording to configured rules
YOUR ACTION

A fault is recorded for heat pump WP-03.

THE SOFTWARE HELPS

Location, manual and history form the same context.

WHAT THIS DELIVERS

The basic information is together.

02Plan the workAccording to configured rules
YOUR ACTION

You select the person responsible and the date.

THE SOFTWARE HELPS

The work order can be monitored through the configured follow-up.

WHAT THIS DELIVERS

Fewer separate reminders.

03Complete the fileAccording to configured rules
YOUR ACTION

The contractor adds the report and photo; the authorised role reviews them.

THE SOFTWARE HELPS

The intervention and costs remain linked to WP-03.

WHAT THIS DELIVERS

For a subsequent fault, you can retrieve the history.

04Finish with a clear resultYour review
YOUR ACTION

You review the recorded data and decide what is complete and what still requires follow-up.

THE SOFTWARE HELPS

The decision refers to the same source, task or file context; there is no silent copy to another workspace.

WHAT THIS DELIVERS

A clear status and a traceable next step.

Less chasing and searching; better visibility into recurring problems and costs.

Automation remains dependent on configuration and available features. No real message, document or instruction is processed here.

View all features

Meet Nico

Maintenance

From a reported issue to follow-up, starting with the building.

Explore a practical example
Nico

Nico

Maintenance

Product specialist

Contact us

Watch the practical example

Pilot direction: start with one workspace and expand later.

ObraPad is designed to keep Obra Core as the shared foundation while you add capabilities over time.

Building-specific activation and restricted installer access are being prepared for the pilot and verified end to end. Ask which scopes can currently be tested.

Intended starting point

The pilot direction is to begin with one workspace and add more later.

Planned per-building expansion

The planned flow activates Construction only for the building being renovated; other buildings stay unchanged.

Planned access model

The access model is being developed so an installer or partner can use only the selected building, installation or task.

Intended example: heat pump maintenance

In the intended scenario, the installer only accesses the heat pump, its documents and assigned maintenance tasks in one building. Other buildings, financial information and private documents remain outside the scope. View, change, duration and revocation controls must be proven server-side before availability.

The design keeps an additional workspace and partner access as separate choices, with the building passport as the shared foundation.

Help me choose